29 Aug
2012
29 Aug
'12
12:27 p.m.
On 08/29/2012 02:22 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Michel Juillardmichel.juillard@mjui.fr writes:
I think that we should consider the current state as a bug and port back the changes in 4.3. Tell me if you disagree.
I agree.
Also, please don't forget Octave in the refactoring process.
Sure. My understanding is that Octave uses the old Matlab interface with a rangom generator equivalent to Matlab's current default, but I will check.
Best
Michel
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev