On 08/29/2012 02:22 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Michel Juillard <michel.juillard@mjui.fr> writes:

I think that we should consider the current state as a bug and port back the
changes in 4.3. Tell me if you disagree.
I agree.

Also, please don't forget Octave in the refactoring process.
Sure. My understanding is that Octave uses the old Matlab interface with a rangom generator equivalent to Matlab's current default, but I will check.

Best

Michel

      

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev