I am puzzled by the problem reported by the first poster in this thread:
http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2829
I am able to reproduce the problem at 2nd and 3rd order, but not at 1st.
At 2nd order, given the decision rules, is it clear that for a shock to "eta", if "e" is maintained to zero, then "a" should remain constant.
However it is not what happens in the IRF graphs: "a" moves, by a not so small amount.
Is this a bug in the IRF generation code, or am I missing something obvious?
Best,
This is not a bug. I answered the message on the forum.
Best
Michel
On 10/19/2011 11:17 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
I am puzzled by the problem reported by the first poster in this thread:
http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2829
I am able to reproduce the problem at 2nd and 3rd order, but not at 1st.
At 2nd order, given the decision rules, is it clear that for a shock to "eta", if "e" is maintained to zero, then "a" should remain constant.
However it is not what happens in the IRF graphs: "a" moves, by a not so small amount.
Is this a bug in the IRF generation code, or am I missing something obvious?
Best,
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev