Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
1) the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv -gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
2) the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
3) thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon.
In themeantime I have two questions:
1) I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in /mex/source: I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
2) I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dear Michel,
1) thanks a lot for pointing to the sylvester routines; 2) I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4; 3) I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in /mex/source: I
get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in /mex/source:
I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
2) Many thanks for looking into the build_matlab for WIndows
3) I have used mode_check_nolik option (with default = 0) in the mode_chek that i just committed
best Marco
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in /mex/source:
I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi Marco,
I have checked build_matlab.m on my Windows machine (with a home brewn mexopts.bat for gcc/cygwin). It works, but the content of CDEBUGFLAFS isn't used by my mexopts.bat.
Try to remove references to CDEBUGFLAGS in build_matlab.m. (It isn't used anyway).
A more amitious course would be to debug you mex.pl to understand why it objects to this flag.
Best
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Many thanks for looking into the build_matlab for WIndows
I have used mode_check_nolik option (with default = 0) in the
mode_chek that i just committed
best Marco
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in
/mex/source: I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi Michel,
thank you, I will have further attempts following your suggestions Best Marco
Hi Marco,
I have checked build_matlab.m on my Windows machine (with a home brewn mexopts.bat for gcc/cygwin). It works, but the content of CDEBUGFLAFS isn't used by my mexopts.bat.
Try to remove references to CDEBUGFLAGS in build_matlab.m. (It isn't used anyway).
A more amitious course would be to debug you mex.pl to understand why it objects to this flag.
Best
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Many thanks for looking into the build_matlab for WIndows
I have used mode_check_nolik option (with default = 0) in the
mode_chek that i just committed
best Marco
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in
/mex/source: I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dear Michel,
I have fixed some problems with my compiler installation and now things are almost OK. I just get the attached error compiling simulate
many thanks again for your help best wishes Marco
Hi Marco,
I have checked build_matlab.m on my Windows machine (with a home brewn mexopts.bat for gcc/cygwin). It works, but the content of CDEBUGFLAFS isn't used by my mexopts.bat.
Try to remove references to CDEBUGFLAGS in build_matlab.m. (It isn't used anyway).
A more amitious course would be to debug you mex.pl to understand why it objects to this flag.
Best
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Many thanks for looking into the build_matlab for WIndows
I have used mode_check_nolik option (with default = 0) in the
mode_chek that i just committed
best Marco
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in
/mex/source: I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi Marco,
this means most likely that your compiler (or rather the C++ library coming with the compiler doesn't know about these functions). We should think about providing code for them when they aren't available on the plateform of the user. The last error is something we should maybe look into more carefully.
All the best,
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Dear Michel,
I have fixed some problems with my compiler installation and now things are almost OK. I just get the attached error compiling simulate
many thanks again for your help best wishes Marco
Hi Marco,
I have checked build_matlab.m on my Windows machine (with a home brewn mexopts.bat for gcc/cygwin). It works, but the content of CDEBUGFLAFS isn't used by my mexopts.bat.
Try to remove references to CDEBUGFLAGS in build_matlab.m. (It isn't used anyway).
A more amitious course would be to debug you mex.pl to understand why it objects to this flag.
Best
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Many thanks for looking into the build_matlab for WIndows
I have used mode_check_nolik option (with default = 0) in the
mode_chek that i just committed
best Marco
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I need your feedback.
Hi Marco,
- the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv
-gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient
- the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX
configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions.
- thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we
shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is confusing. With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. What do the other developers think?
All the best,
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Sylverster equation Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it
Dear Michel,
I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab routine for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with Nikolai' staff this week in Lisobon. In themeantime I have two questions:
- I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in
/mex/source: I get the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably miss something;
- I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd graphical
layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with if, into one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with this?
Many thanks for your help, best wishes Marco
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Hi It looks to me like the include path has not been resolved properly or include files have not been included. Best regards
George
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michel Juillard" michel.juillard@ens.fr To: "List for Dynare developers" dev@dynare.org Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [DynareDev] gensylv+buid_matlab+check_mode
Hi Marco,
this means most likely that your compiler (or rather the C++ library coming with the compiler doesn't know about these functions). We should think about providing code for them when they aren't available on the plateform of the user. The last error is something we should maybe look into more carefully.
All the best,
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Dear Michel,
I have fixed some problems with my compiler installation and now things are almost OK. I just get the attached error compiling simulate
many thanks again for your help best wishes Marco
Hi Marco,
I have checked build_matlab.m on my Windows machine (with a home brewn mexopts.bat for gcc/cygwin). It works, but the content of CDEBUGFLAFS isn't used by my mexopts.bat.
Try to remove references to CDEBUGFLAGS in build_matlab.m. (It isn't used anyway).
A more amitious course would be to debug you mex.pl to understand why it objects to this flag.
Best
Michel
Marco Ratto wrote:
Many thanks for looking into the build_matlab for WIndows
I have used mode_check_nolik option (with default = 0) in the
mode_chek that i just committed
best Marco
- I have either lcc or Microsoft Visual C/C++ ver 6.0; I get the
problems either with matlab 7.0 and 7.4;
I tried to look for CDEBUGFLAGS in Matlab for Windows mex stuff but kind find it, when it is in Linux. The mex stuff is completely different between to two systems. I still have to check if the new buyild_matlab works on my old Windows machine
- I agree to flip the sign to get the correct max shape; I will
correct the label; we need to give a name to the option for plotting only the posterior: what about
options_.mode_check_lik = 1 (plot also the likelihood kernel) options_.mode_check_lik = 0 (plot only posterior)
then in estimation the options should be mode_check (new behavior) mode_check_nolik (old behavior) (to be modified in the preprocessor)
Best
Michel
all the best Marco
> Everybody on the dev@dynare.org list, please look at 3) below. I > need your feedback. > > Hi Marco, > > 1) the Sylvester-like functions are in matlab/gensylv > -gensylv.m is a replacement when gensylv.dll is missing > -sylvester3.m is the function that your are looking for > -sylvester3a.m is an iterative refinement of the solution if you > consider that the accuracy of the previous function is insufficient > > 2) the build_matlab problem comes from the fact that the MEX > configuration for your compiler does not know option CDEBUGFLAGS= > What is you compiler? What is the version of Matlab ? It is also > possible that this script doesn't work with older Matalb versions. > > 3) thank you for this new version of mode_check. I wonder if we > shouldn't change the sign and really plot the log-posterior and > log-likelihood. Also, as you force the log-likelihood to > intersect the log-posterior at the computed mode, it is a > log-likelihood kernel (the level of the log-posterior being > correct). This should be indicated in the label otherwise, it is > confusing. > With these changes, I believe it can become the new default for > mode_check, but we need to provide an option to get the old graphs. > What do the other developers think? > > All the best, > > Michel > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Sylverster equation > Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:26:07 +0200 > From: rattoma marco.ratto@jrc.it > To: Michel Juillard michel.juillard@ens.fr > References: 4A24238B.1060503@ens.fr 4A2CC2D0.10601@jrc.it > > > > Dear Michel, > > I just would like to remind you, if possible, to dig out a matlab > routine > for generalized Sylvester equation, so I may try to plug it with > Nikolai' > staff this week in Lisobon. > In themeantime I have two questions: > > 1) I cannot successfully run the build_matlab script in > /mex/source: I get > the attached error in windows. Do you have any hint? I probably
miss
> something; > > 2) I am going to commit a new mode_check with the attacehd
graphical
> layiout. Moreover, I have squeezed the actual tjhree cases with > if, into > one single for loop, for easier parallelization. Are you OK with > this? > > Many thanks for your help, > best wishes > Marco >
---
> > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@dynare.org > http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
-
G. Perendia -
Marco Ratto -
Michel Juillard