On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM, houtan <
houtanb@gmail.com <mailto:
houtanb@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
How should the following input be handled:
svar_identification;
exclusion lag 0;
equation 1, y, c;
equation 1, c, k;
end;
Should this be
1) Invalid. Stop execution and tell user why
2) Valid. Combine the Symbol List to be y, c, k
3) Valid. Overwrite Symbol List as c, k and warn user
I'm guessing 1), but just wanted to make sure everyone agrees.
Best,
Houtan
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michel Juillard
<
michel.juillard@ens.fr <mailto:
michel.juillard@ens.fr>> wrote:
I have updated SWZ in SVN to include changes that were already
present in what I presented last week.
I have added to the wiki a detailed description of the
interface for SVAR exclusion restriction in
http://www.dynare.org/DynareWiki/SvarExclusionInterface the Qi and Ri matrices should be implemented by Houtan in the
preprocessor. Karl and Stephane have just to write a small
identification/exclusions.m and identification/lower_cholesky.m
All the best,
Michel
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list