Hi Stephane,<br _moz_dirty="" /><br _moz_dirty="" />thanks a lot. Indeed what you suggest is much more robust. Please change that<br _moz_dirty="" /><br _moz_dirty="" />best<br _moz_dirty="" />Marco<br _moz_dirty="" /><div style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><br /><br /><span>On 03/14/12, <b class="name">Stéphane Adjemian </b> &lt;stepan@dynare.org&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote cite="mid:4F60864F.2080608@dynare.org" class="iwcQuote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 255); padding-left: 13px; margin-left: 0pt;" type="cite"><div class="mimepart multipart signed">Hi Marco,<br /><br />I have just pushed your last commit (about nograph/nodisplay options).<br /><br />I am not sure that what you done to the tables is the best thing to do.<br />Latex provides packages to split long tables (for instance the<br />supertabular package, other packages are described here<br /><a href="http://www.tug.org/pracjourn/2007-1/mori/mori.pdf%29" target="_blank">http://www.tug.org/pracjourn/2007-1/mori/mori.pdf)</a> and we should use<br />them instead of abitrarily cut the tables after fifty lines (because the<br />maximum number of lines should depend on the font size, magin sizes and<br />orientation. If there is no objections I will change that...<br /><br />Best,<br />Stéphane.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></div></blockquote></div>