The user who originally reported the issue has provided more info at http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7155
@Houtan: does the info on MacOS given there provide any clues?
Von: Dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dynare.org] Im Auftrag von Johannes Pfeifer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 18:26
An: 'List for Dynare developers'
Betreff: Re: [DynareDev] Dynare++ Memory
Most probably not, but I am not sure if it’s not a symptom of the same underlying problem. The error messages/crashes seem to be different for order=6 on different OS, which may have to do with Dynare++ turning to a different algorithm depending on the detected memory.
--------
Johannes Pfeifer
Friesenwall 104
50672 Köln
Mobil: +49-(0)170-6936820
jpfeifer@gmx.de
Von: Dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dynare.org] Im Auftrag von Michel Juillard
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 18:17
An: List for Dynare developers
Betreff: Re: [DynareDev] Dynare++ Memory
What I mean is that negative memory reported by Windows is not responsible for the crash in all OS for high orders
On August 12, 2015 6:02:52 PM CEST, Johannes Pfeifer <jpfeifer@gmx.de> wrote:
It's the same mod-file, Approx_10.mod, just used in the two programs with order=3. As far as I understood, they rely on the same underlying routines.
--------
Johannes Pfeifer
Friesenwall 104
50672 Köln
Mobil: +49-(0)170-6936820
jpfeifer@gmx.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dynare.org] Im Auftrag von Michel Juillard
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 18:01
An: List for Dynare developers
Betreff: Re: [DynareDev] Dynare++ Memory
OK, but this is a problem different from the one encountered with Approx_10.mod
Johannes Pfeifer writes:
Dynare++ always diagnoses 0 memory and k_order_pert.mexw64 in Dynare unstable always negative memory.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dev
[mailto:dev-bounces@dynare.org] Im Auftrag von Michel
Juillard
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 17:29
An: List for Dynare developers
Betreff: Re: [DynareDev] Dynare++ Memory
Are you saying that under Windows, dynare++ always diagnoses negative memory?
Johannes Pfeifer writes:
Sébastien also indicated some time ago that this message "just"
triggers a different algorithm. But this is still a very undesirable
behavior. I get this exact same message in the jnl file that is
created when I use this mod-file with Dynare under Matlab at order 3
with the k_order_pert.mex64. In this case, at order=3 memory should
not be an issue. But the mex-file diagnoses negative memory and
immediately switches to the different algorithm from the start.
--------
Johannes Pfeifer
Friesenwall 104
50672 Köln
Mobil: +49-(0)170-6936820
jpfeifer@gmx.de
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dynare.org] Im Auftrag von Michel
Juillard
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 15:28
An: List for Dynare developers
Betreff: Re: [DynareDev] Dynare++ Memory
Looking again the the journal, I believe now that the message "run
out of memory" is not an error message but an information that
triggers a change in the trade-off between speed and memory (i.e.
decreasing number of the
threads)
I don't think that dynare++ catches memory allocation failure and
just crashes at that point.
Michel Juillard writes:
Johannes,
do you know for which order
this example is working on your machine
and for which order it doesn't?
When it is working does the jnl make sense?
It may be that 8GB is not enough to even store the derivatives of
the model before starting computations but that for some reason the
program doesn't crash until much later.
Best
Michel
Johannes Pfeifer writes:
Hi Michel,
I ran dynare++ on the mentioned mod-file again under Windows++ and
used the system monitoring tools for monitoring memory usage. The
picture is attached. The blue line shows the percent of memory used
of my 8GB RAM on my Laptop from the start until the crash. As you
can see, there is not much movement. I do not get anywhere close to
the 8GB of memory used for the task that you report
for Linux.
Rather, straight from the beginning the jnl-file reports 0
available memory and "out of memory". It simply seems as if
Dynare++ is hardly using any memory straight from the start. This
Dynare++ does not
seem to be just a problem of measuring memory usage on Windows.
Best,
Johannes
------
Johannes Pfeifer
Department of Economics
University of Mannheim
L7, 3-5, Room 242
68131 Mannheim
Germany
+49 (0)621 181-3430
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
Michel Juillard
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.