Re: [DynareDev] SWZ

houtan wrote:

Also, regarding the upper and lower cholesky options, is the following output OK:

almost:

options_.ms.upper_cholesky = 1; options_.ms.lower_cholesky = 1;

the options are just variables, they must have a value

Best

Michel

Thanks, Houtan

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM, houtan <houtanb@gmail.com mailto:houtanb@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

How should the following input be handled:
svar_identification;
 exclusion lag 0;
 equation 1, y, c;
 equation 1, c, k;
end;

Should this be
1) Invalid. Stop execution and tell user why
2) Valid. Combine the Symbol List to be y, c, k
3) Valid. Overwrite Symbol List as c, k and warn user

I'm guessing 1), but just wanted to make sure everyone agrees.

Best,
Houtan



On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michel Juillard
<michel.juillard@ens.fr <mailto:michel.juillard@ens.fr>> wrote:

    I have updated SWZ in SVN to include changes that were already
    present in what I presented last week.

    I have added to the wiki a detailed description of the
    interface for SVAR exclusion restriction in
    http://www.dynare.org/DynareWiki/SvarExclusionInterface

    the Qi and Ri matrices should be implemented by Houtan in the
    preprocessor. Karl and Stephane have just to write a small
    identification/exclusions.m and identification/lower_cholesky.m

    All the best,

    Michel



    _______________________________________________
    Dev mailing list
    Dev@dynare.org <mailto:Dev@dynare.org>
    http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

---

---

Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev