Also, regarding the upper and lower cholesky options, is the following output OK:
options_.ms.upper_cholesky;
options_.ms.lower_cholesky;

Thanks,
Houtan



On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM, houtan <houtanb@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

How should the following input be handled:
svar_identification;
 exclusion lag 0;
 equation 1, y, c;
 equation 1, c, k;
end;

Should this be
1) Invalid. Stop execution and tell user why
2) Valid. Combine the Symbol List to be y, c, k
3) Valid. Overwrite Symbol List as c, k and warn user

I'm guessing 1), but just wanted to make sure everyone agrees.

Best,
Houtan



On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michel Juillard <michel.juillard@ens.fr> wrote:
I have updated SWZ in SVN to include changes that were already present in what I presented last week.

I have added to the wiki a detailed description of the interface for SVAR exclusion restriction in
http://www.dynare.org/DynareWiki/SvarExclusionInterface

the Qi and Ri matrices should be implemented by Houtan in the preprocessor. Karl and Stephane have just to write a small
identification/exclusions.m and identification/lower_cholesky.m

All the best,

Michel



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev