Hi Michel,
thanks
for helping the original poster. But my issue was rather
that it is strange to complain about initial values in later
runs of steady. I was wondering why the misleading error
message is triggered by something else and still consider
this a bug. At least in the long term we should not use an
error triggered by invalid starting values to crash the
steady state computation, if steady simply is not able to
find a steady state (even if the reason is that the model is
wrong).
Best,
Johannes
--
Johannes
Pfeifer
Haußerstr.
29
72076
Tübingen
Tel.:
+49-(0)7071-6396184
Mobil.:
+49-(0)170-6936820
Germany
Hi Johannes,
I responded directly on the forum. He defines mua and mux as
zero mean processes and then use them as arguments in
non-linear equations without taking the exponential. This is
stupid but very hard to spot or to come-up with a more
meaningful error message.
Best
Michel
On 10/29/2012 09:13 AM, Johannes Pfeifer wrote:
Dear Michel,
could you have a look at
http://www.dynare.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4151&sid=98769af7c5cb0e2f9e46ccb899e0210f
The original values for
steady state computation are valid. However, later on during
steady state computation in solve1 the error message
STEADY: numerical
initial values incompatible with the following equations
10
is triggered. I think
this is a bug.
Best,
Johannes
--
Johannes
Pfeifer
Haußerstr.
29
72076
Tübingen
Tel.:
+49-(0)7071-6396184
Mobil.:
+49-(0)170-6936820
Germany
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev