How do we handle these bugs in packaging for one particular architecture?
Do we replace the package silently ? Do we have different version numbers for different packages? Do we make a bug fixing release for all architectures, even if nothing changes in some?
Best
Michel
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: r2081 - dynare_v4/debian Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:02:33 +0200 From: sebastien@pythie.cepremap.cnrs.fr To: subversion_users@cepremap.cnrs.fr
Author: sebastien Date: 2008-09-17 18:02:33 +0200 (Wed, 17 Sep 2008) New Revision: 2081
Modified: dynare_v4/debian/dynare.install Log: trunk debian/ubuntu packaging: added missing matlab/distributions/ and matlab/distributions/toolbox/ directories
Modified: dynare_v4/debian/dynare.install =================================================================== --- dynare_v4/debian/dynare.install 2008-09-17 16:00:41 UTC (rev 2080) +++ dynare_v4/debian/dynare.install 2008-09-17 16:02:33 UTC (rev 2081) @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ -matlab/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab -matlab/gensylv/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/gensylv -matlab/qz/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/qz -matlab/kronecker/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/kronecker -mex/octave/*.mex /usr/lib/dynare/mex/octave -mex/octave/rcond.m /usr/lib/dynare/mex/octave -preprocessor/dynare_m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab +matlab/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab +matlab/gensylv/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/gensylv +matlab/qz/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/qz +matlab/kronecker/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/kronecker +matlab/distributions/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/distributions +matlab/distributions/toolbox/*.m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab/distributions/toolbox +mex/octave/*.mex /usr/lib/dynare/mex/octave +mex/octave/rcond.m /usr/lib/dynare/mex/octave +preprocessor/dynare_m /usr/lib/dynare/matlab