Le lundi 03 mars 2014 à 09:48 +0100, Johannes Pfeifer a écrit :
is there a particular reason for not saving the results of osr (stored in osr_res during the run of osr.m) into oo_? If not, I would suggest to add a subfield osr to oo_ in order to store
oo_.osr.optim_params and oo_.osr.objective_function
My current reading is that those values are printed, but are not easily accessible.
That looks good to me.
Michel, is there any reason for not doing this?