Re: [DynareDev] SWZ Question regarding max_lag_length r

Le vendredi 04 décembre 2009 à 11:40 -0500, houtan a écrit :

One final question. Should syntax such as this be allowed:

exclusion lag 0; equation 1, pie, r; exclusion lag 0; equation 2, y;

(i.e. lags are repeated but equation numbers are different) or should we declare a user error. I am already declaring an error when something such as this is encountered:

exclusion lag 0; equation 1, pie, r; exclusion lag 0; equation 1, pie, r;

(i.e. lags and equation numbers overlap)

For consistency with the rule about equation, we should make an error when there are several exclusion blocks for a given lags (so fail on your two examples)