Re: [DynareDev] SWZ

houtan wrote:

Hello,

How should the following input be handled: svar_identification; exclusion lag 0; equation 1, y, c; equation 1, c, k; end;

Should this be

1. Invalid. Stop execution and tell user why
2. Valid. Combine the Symbol List to be y, c, k
3. Valid. Overwrite Symbol List as c, k and warn user

I'm guessing 1), but just wanted to make sure everyone agrees.

Yes, 1) is correct because most likely the result of the user's mistake. She would think all the restrictions on a equation in a single operation.

Anybody disagrees?

Best

Michel

Best, Houtan

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Michel Juillard <michel.juillard@ens.fr mailto:michel.juillard@ens.fr> wrote:

I have updated SWZ in SVN to include changes that were already
present in what I presented last week.

I have added to the wiki a detailed description of the interface
for SVAR exclusion restriction in
http://www.dynare.org/DynareWiki/SvarExclusionInterface

the Qi and Ri matrices should be implemented by Houtan in the
preprocessor. Karl and Stephane have just to write a small
identification/exclusions.m and identification/lower_cholesky.m

All the best,

Michel



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org <mailto:Dev@dynare.org>
http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

---

---

Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org http://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev