Hi Ondra,
1) I committed a few changes to dynare++ brought about the George's work on package k_order as a DLL for Dynare Matlab - earlier in the Spring I added an option to set qz_criterium in order to the user to be able to put it slightly above 1 if the model contains unit roots (as in Dynare Matlab). It is at that time that I added by mistake the printing of D and E that you removed today. Sorry about that. - today I added a comment concerning dr_centralize and added a function to be able to write a TwoDMatrix to memory is order to be able to pass results back to the calling program 2) In order to facilitate building k_order DLL, we would like to merge dynare++ and dynare, keeping the same directory architecture. Sebastien would then build an autoconf/configure set of files for compiling both standalone dynare++ and k_order DLL and we would produce binaries for standalone dynare++ at the same time as the other binaries of dynare. Would you agree to that? 3) I observed that for leads on more than 1 period, dynare++ and dynare don't provide the same 2nd order approximation. We should investigate the origin of the difference 4) Is your simulate DLL compatible with dr_centralize option?
All the best,
Michel