Sorry for the message in French. I did not realize that I was writing to the entire list.

Best

Michel

On 09/17/2011 05:40 PM, Michel Juillard wrote:
Salut Stephane,

estimation est casse a cause de
??? Undefined function or method 'nanmean' for input arguments of type
'double'.

Error in ==> initialize_dataset at 78
dataset_.descriptive.mean = nanmean(dataset_.rawdata);

Il y a actuellement 13 tests qui ne passent pas. Ca vient sans doute de changement qui existent sur ta machine mais que tu n'as as commis.

Dans ce cas precis, on pourrait revenir en arriere sans re-ecrire l'histoire (on garde trace de tes changements et du retour en arriere), mais si c'est facile de corriger les problemes restants c'est sans doute mieux de garder tes changements

amicalement

Michel

Je viens de corriger un probleme avec make check. Ca marche maintenant (il faudra


On 09/17/2011 04:03 PM, Stéphane Adjemian wrote:
I have just fixed the bugs I mentionned earlier today. I cannot remember how to trigger the tests from the make command (make check doesn't work on my machine) but
the mod files I tried are working (estimation, and simulation, are not crashing).

I am not sure I know how to revert master... And I am even less sure that this would be a good idea (I was told that we should never rewrite history).

The snapshots (donwloadable from the website) up to 13-Sep-2011 02:08 are not affected by my commits.

I agree that it is urgent to put in place the testing version. I don't see the problem with name... Most of the people work with the snapshots. All we have to do is
to build the snapshots from the testing (or whatever name) branch which should be updated automatically from the master (unstable).

Meanwhile, I will try not to commit anything on master...

Best, Stéphane.



Michel Juillard <michel.juillard@mjui.fr> writes:

It is very urgent to put in place the testing version that we talked about. I have referred several people to the unstable version for things that I fixed over the Summer and we can't having it broken over long periods of time (more than one day, I would say)

In fact, intstead of having stable, (new) testing, unstable, I would suggest that we have stable, unstable (that we try to keep in workable state), (new) experimental which is not supposed to be entirely working. The names will be a bit misleading but it will avoid
to have to inform people who download unstable to have to download testing instead.

Stephane,
could you please revert master to a workable state and create a new experimental branch with the problematic merge instead, if you can't fix master today. We can always change the names of the branches when we come back from Frankfurt.

Best

Michel

On 09/17/2011 11:36 AM, Stéphane Adjemian wrote:

    Dear all,
    
    The estimation in dynare/master is broken since (my) commit 322adb92a5ee378ac89610678aeef8e65cebae1e. I am importing new versions of the estimation routines from
    one of my private branch which have diverged from master. I try to fix this as soon as possible... But it is very likely that I will break again dynare/master
    in the next weeks (not only the estimation).
    
    Best,
    Stéphane.
    
    --
    Stéphane Adjemian
    Université du Maine, Gains et Cepremap
    Tel(Gains):    +33(0)2 43 83 31 35
    Tel(Cepremap): +33(0)1 40 77 84 19

    _______________________________________________
    Dev mailing list
    Dev@dynare.org
    https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@dynare.org
https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@dynare.org https://www.dynare.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev