Hi,
This is a summary report for the unitary tests in Dynare. Full report can
be found at:
http://www.dynare.org/stepan/dynare/tests/report-a75d8d318ec5384a5d143cfdaa…http://www.dynare.org/stepan/dynare/tests/report-a75d8d318ec5384a5d143cfdaa…
Last commit a75d8d318ec5384a5d143cfdaa463eb56efa97a3 by Houtan Bastani, 6
hours ago
-> stoch_simul: add loglinear option #431
===========================
DYNARE/MATLAB UNITARY TESTS
===========================
| TOTAL: 141
| PASS: 139
| FAIL: 2
|
| LIST OF FAILED TESTS:
| * ../matlab/(a)dynSeries/set_names.m (test #1{4})
| * ../matlab/(a)dynSeries/set_names.m (test #2{1})
(moving the discussion back to the Dynare list)
Le mardi 06 août 2013 à 10:26 -0400, Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde a
écrit :
> Sebeastien: how do you compute the analytic derivatives in Julia (or are
> you just computing numerical ones?)
I compute analytic derivatives using the possibility given by Julia of
manipulating the syntax tree of mathematical expressions. Note that my
code is compatible with Julia 0.1, but probably not with the development
branch since it changed the way of manipulating expressions; I will
update my code for Julia 0.2 when it is out.
Concerning Julia, I am indeed very enthusiastic about it. I did an
experiment with a sovereign default model that I had previously coded in
C++ (the solution method is a variant of VFI), and it turns out that the
Julia code for the same model is both shorter and faster. I therefore
think that Julia may be the next big thing in scientific computing,
though it is too early to be sure.
Concerning the relationship between Dynare and Julia, my view is a mix of possibilities 1 and 3 given by Michel.
That is, I think we should strive towards developing a library of Julia
code for manipulating and solving models, and then provide a frontend
which would use that library and which would be able to parse MOD files
(at least the non-MATLAB part of them).
I don't believe much in a MATLAB/Julia hybrid software, it would still
have the limitations of MATLAB while increasing the complexity of the
whole thing. For that reason, I think that Dynare as it exists today
under MATLAB/Octave will continue to exist for quite some time. Next to
that, we can create a distinct Julia-based software following the
principles that I outline above. My code on Github is a first step in
that direction, and I intend to continue that effort in the coming
academic year.
Best,
--
Sébastien Villemot
Researcher in Economics
Dynare developer
http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
Hi,
This is a summary report for the unitary tests in Dynare. Full report can
be found at:
http://www.dynare.org/stepan/dynare/tests/report-201239dbf7cc3d47ec6aefcb8c…http://www.dynare.org/stepan/dynare/tests/report-201239dbf7cc3d47ec6aefcb8c…
Last commit 201239dbf7cc3d47ec6aefcb8cad0fc418a70885 by Houtan Bastani, 4
hours ago
-> introduce verbatim block closes #437
===========================
DYNARE/MATLAB UNITARY TESTS
===========================
| TOTAL: 141
| PASS: 139
| FAIL: 2
|
| LIST OF FAILED TESTS:
| * ../matlab/(a)dynSeries/set_names.m (test #1{4})
| * ../matlab/(a)dynSeries/set_names.m (test #2{1})
Hi,
This is a summary report for the unitary tests in Dynare. Full report can
be found at:
http://www.dynare.org/stepan/dynare/tests/report-85667336a18ea1a03bdb2d4071…http://www.dynare.org/stepan/dynare/tests/report-85667336a18ea1a03bdb2d4071…
Last commit 85667336a18ea1a03bdb2d4071bcd93edc07094f by Houtan Bastani, 36
minutes ago
-> macroprocessor: add length command. closes #436
===========================
DYNARE/MATLAB UNITARY TESTS
===========================
| TOTAL: 141
| PASS: 139
| FAIL: 2
|
| LIST OF FAILED TESTS:
| * ../matlab/(a)dynSeries/set_names.m (test #1{4})
| * ../matlab/(a)dynSeries/set_names.m (test #2{1})
b4f8532bea4aa5312c676969f0ee01606e2e7055 Merge pull request #441 from JohannesPfeifer/mode_check
Dynare failed to compile or MATLAB testsuite failed to run
Dynare failed to compile or Octave testsuite failed to run
A full log can be found on karaba in '/tmp/dynare-master-check-XCxbUyXIAp.log'.