Hi Ondra,
1) I committed a few changes to dynare++ brought about the George's work
on package k_order as a DLL for Dynare Matlab
- earlier in the Spring I added an option to set qz_criterium in order
to the user to be able to put it slightly above 1 if the model contains
unit roots (as in Dynare Matlab). It is at that time that I added by
mistake the printing of D and E that you removed today. Sorry about that.
- today I added a comment concerning dr_centralize and added a function
to be able to write a TwoDMatrix to memory is order to be able to pass
results back to the calling program
2) In order to facilitate building k_order DLL, we would like to merge
dynare++ and dynare, keeping the same directory architecture. Sebastien
would then build an autoconf/configure set of files for compiling both
standalone dynare++ and k_order DLL and we would produce binaries for
standalone dynare++ at the same time as the other binaries of dynare.
Would you agree to that?
3) I observed that for leads on more than 1 period, dynare++ and dynare
don't provide the same 2nd order approximation. We should investigate
the origin of the difference
4) Is your simulate DLL compatible with dr_centralize option?
All the best,
Michel